Broken Culture is Killing Education

by Elizabeth King on March 31, 2011

I was recently reading Clay Shirky’s Cognitive Surplus and had an “aha moment,” hitting a connection between what had been (at least in my head) two totally unrelated projects. Well, I don’t know that they’re actually connected; the whole thing is still completely hypothetical at this point. Since I don’t have a research department and team at my disposal, I could either sit on the thought or share it here. I usually sit on those ideas, and that gets me nowhere. What’s the worst that can happen? It turns out I’m wrong? I can live with that.Culture: A community's set of shared assumptions about how it should go about its work and about its member's relations with one another.

The Experiment That Fired Up My Thinking

Here’s the story: Shirky’s book discusses an experiment involving childcare workers in Haifa, Israel. I’d read about the experiment before—no idea where—but the way he framed it resonated with me this time around. If you’re unfamiliar with the experiment, I’ll give you the shortest, nuts-n-bolts breakdown I can. Essentially, the researchers were hoping to get a better understanding of the effects of “penalties” on behavior.

People Show up Late for Pick-up

People were always picking up their kids late at daycare, using excuses like traffic, working late, whatever. Initially, there was no penalty for picking up a child after hours; it was tacitly understood that parents should respect the daycare workers’ time and do everything within their power to pick up their children as promptly as possible. This was a reflection of their culture, which Shirky aptly defines as “a community’s set of shared assumptions about how it should go about its work, and about its members’ relations with one another.” [Ref] p 143, Cognitive Surplus, emphasis mine[/Ref]

They Added a Fine for Late Pick-up

The experiment made one move: it added a penalty to the rule structure. You’re late to pickup? You pay a fine. The fine was only 3 sheckels (which Shirky says at the time was about ten bucks), so this wasn’t do-or-die. However, you leave your kid after hours? You pay.

More Late Pickups and a Fundamental Shift in The Social Contract

What happened? Late pickups increased. In fact, they more than doubled. Suddenly, instead of feeling guilty about taking advantage of the valuable time of the daycare worker, parents went about their business and picked up the kids at their convenience. By charging for the time, the experimenters unwittingly replaced in the parents’ minds the social value of the workers’ time with a monetary sum. Lateness was no longer an issue of respect, a social issue; it was just a couple bucks.

Moreover, once the experiment was over and the penalty was redacted, parents still picked up their kids late. One can only assume that once their relationship to the workers was fully commoditized, parents, however unintentionally, permanently stripped their social relationship and sense of obligation to the daycare workers from the arrangement.

Shirky describes it this way:

How we treat one another matters, and not just in a “it’s nice to be nice” kind of way: our behavior contributes to an environment that encourages some opportunity and hinders others. …When [the Haifa daycare] culture came to include an explicit fine, the parents could view the workers as a means to an end, rather than as partners with a mix of social and commercial bonds. [Ref] p 135, Cognitive Surplus [/ref]

My Aha! Moment

Penalty or no penalty, the commoditization of social responsibility that happened at Haifa isn’t an isolated phenomenon. This is science that begins to illustrate what’s happening to education–it’s often viewed as either a waste of time or a means to an end, which means it’s been compartmentalized and removed from a larger, social understanding. Somehow (not sure how just yet) we’ve commoditized our culture’s relationship with education and socially devalued it–with notably bad results.

There are so many contributing factors here, and what’s correlative and causative, I’m not sure, since I’m not usually running SAS regressions in my office. Either way, here are some of the elements I’m considering:

  • By offering so much at school (so many topics and activities), did we accidentally remove parents’ sense of responsibility to teach and model learning in society?
  • Did our general sense of entitlement and fixation on our rights cause us to forget that an education, from a global perspective, is a privilege, honor, and reflection of our social health?
  • Did we adjust to the relatively recent anonymity of our business relationships (meaning shopping at Target instead of the corner store) and extend that to teachers and schools?
  • Has what we do in the classroom confused schools’ direct connection with larger “social and commercial bonds”?

At the Haifa daycare center, they never recovered. Even after the penalty fee was lifted, the perception of the workers’ time as less valuable and the parents’ sense of responsibility to them was permanent: the groundwork of culture and social responsibility shifted. If the same shifts are taking place in education, can we honestly hope to reverse them?

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

Mike March 31, 2011 at 12:56 pm

Have we, in our efforts to coddle this generation by giving trophies to every team in the soccer league (not to mention widespread grade inflation), convinced ourselves that effort is all that matters, not results?

I can’t even count the number of parents I’ve talked to whose incredulity about a child’s poor performance on the SAT results in misdirected anger at the test, and not consideration that maybe the child has been performing at a substandard level for some time before the SAT set it in such stark relief.

Maybe this is what you’re getting at in a more graceful way with your bullet point about entitlement?

Reply

Elizabeth King March 31, 2011 at 1:18 pm

To be completely honest, I hadn’t even thought about the SAT– it’s not really what I think about when I think about education or write at SooS. I’m also not saying “kids are crappy at school” or “it’s the kids’ fault” here (although I definitely think that sometimes it is). I’m more looking from an even broader step out: what’s really at the heart of the educational mood and direction in the U.S.?

I think what I’m really saying is that there’s been a shift in the relationship between Society and School, maybe even a breach in concept of the social contract. We legislate so much that it’s likely that “things you are tacitly expected to do and think for the social good” practically don’t exist anymore (which, on a total side note, may be why conservative political theory can sound so confounding). Anyway, most of what I was thinking about at the time was the #f***school hashtag, the abysmal attendance at parents’ night, that people don’t take their kids to arts events anymore (instead, they let the school do it.) The SAT could disappear tomorrow and these would all be just as significant issues. The point on this blog is to get at real education: critical thinking, problem solving, analysis. I’m sure you and I agree that a whole heck of a lot of that goes on on the SAT, but the SAT is so myopic in scope and I find it so deeply boring to talk about (probably because I have to spend so many hours a day with it.)

Reply

Mike March 31, 2011 at 1:37 pm

I don’t find the SAT as boring to talk about, but I agree with you that it’s really a sideshow to all of this. It’s just the lens through which I’m most often confronted by the inadequacies in our education system: parents are upset that a kid’s critical reading score is below average but admit that the kid never reads, etc.

Whatever the cause, and I think we agree that there’s no simple answer, what you’re talking about here is endemic, troubling, and not going away. I wish more of the national debate about education sounded like this blog.

Reply

Elizabeth King March 31, 2011 at 1:39 pm

I really appreciate that. It’s incredibly encouraging. Thank you.

Reply

Ryan J Riehl March 31, 2011 at 1:54 pm

I remember reading about this story of the daycare in the book Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely. Maybe that’s where you’ve seen it before?

Reply

Elizabeth King March 31, 2011 at 2:01 pm

I haven’t read it, but it’s totally my speed, so I’ll take that as an accidental book rec. Maybe I read about it in the paper? I’m a chronic paper-reader.

Reply

Jenn Cohen March 31, 2011 at 10:25 pm

I think your bullets are relevant talking points, but I just started thinking about this as a literal comparison rather than a big picture one. Hasn’t school BECOME daycare for many parents? For many parents, schools are little more than custodial centers, paid for by their tax dollars. They wash their hands of their children’s educations because they’re “paying” those schools to do the job for them. Because money is changing hands, they are off the hook when it comes to reading to their children, taking them to museums, or visiting the library. I agree with your point that schools offer so many areas of education now that parents don’t feel they have to provide other enrichment. But why DO the schools offer so many subjects? Did that start because educators saw that kids weren’t getting enough additional learning at home, or did the schools start offering more so the parents relinquished the responsibility? I really don’t know, but it’s an interesting thought.

Reply

Elizabeth King March 31, 2011 at 10:43 pm

I guess that’s true too. The only thing there, though, is that we’ve always paid teachers. It’s not new that we pay them–something else happened in this idea of being socially responsible to it. I still can’t put my finger on it….

Reply

Michael E. Gruen April 4, 2011 at 5:09 pm

10 shekel is about 3 dollars. So, 3 shekel is about a dollar.

Just sayin’.

Reply

Elizabeth King April 4, 2011 at 5:11 pm

And, uh, 1 shekel is about 33 cents. Wise guy.

Reply

Michelle April 12, 2011 at 11:02 am

■By offering so much at school (so many topics and activities), did we accidentally remove parents’ sense of responsibility to teach and model learning in society?

I’m not sure I would say topices and activities, but I think when the courts charged the school with in loco parentis, we screwd the teachers, commoditizing (through law rather than with payment) the burden of the school to be responsible and absolved the parent. I think this was a huge mistake.
I’m also thinking that parents and students no longer perceive school as a place to learn, but as a place to play football or the violin on the taxpayer’s dime, so I guess if that’s what the author means, he or she has a point.

■Did our general sense of entitlement and fixation on our rights cause us to forget that an education, from a global perspective, is a privilege, honor, and reflection of our social health?

I think the perception of entitlement and fixation on rights came with educational law. Once the courts began to mandate different aspects of education, society no longer felt the partnership; it was a right.

■Did we adjust to the relatively recent anonymity of our business relationships (meaning shopping at Target instead of the corner store) and extend that to teachers and schools?

I think the shift to perceiving everthing as interchangeable and therefore not differently valuable (McDonaldization of the culture) has pervaded all parts of our culture, including education.

■Has what we do in the classroom confused schools’ direct connection with larger “social and commercial bonds”?

It’s not what we do in the classroom so much as what has been mandated from outside–people no longer perceive teachers as agents of power or change. The power is with the legislators, the administrators (especially in large, complex school districts) and the money-dolers; teachers are perceived as powerless. I’ll be interested to see the effect that the economy has on all this.

Reply

Lesle April 12, 2011 at 5:36 pm

Perhaps this is why Catholic parish elementary schools for the most part successfully create community and with their limited resources and curricula achieve academic outcomes that contribute to high graduation rates at the nearby Catholic high schools.

Reply

Elizabeth King April 12, 2011 at 6:04 pm

I have never thought about that, but it’d be interesting idea to see data about it! Really interesting idea. Thanks!

Reply

Alex Sirota March 23, 2012 at 2:28 pm

Great blog Elizabeth! I enjoy this reading. As parents we have tools that have never been available before to us — stuff like KhanAcademy.org. We can use this to take back our responsability, but that means we have to take action. We simply can’t blame anyone else but ourselves for letting education become the way it is.

I have a niggling though that the path to our kids salvation is one word – entrepreneurship. Learning how to be your own boss as early as 10 years old, and not giving up will make up for all the stupid things that school puts on us starting at 6 years old. It’s a counterweight to the limiting that school does. And it’s not taught at school, pretty much anywhere. It’s taught at home and with your (entrepreneurial) friends.

You can do a simple test for anyone to see how they grasp this concept:

What’s the most important thing to an entrepreneur?

1) time
2) money
3) an idea
4) a customer

What would you answer?

Reply

Elizabeth King March 28, 2012 at 4:36 pm

Well I’d say “time.” Am I right?! : )

Reply

Jeff March 27, 2012 at 11:14 pm

Found you thru the Freshbooks video, Working For Yourself…. This blog and your ideals touch many thoughts I’ve had for years and deal with now with a 2 young children in school (the system). In the late 80′s in Canada here I was told in high school if I didn’t take “Advanced” courses I could not get into University and if I didn’t take that road then Life would be tough and we would likely fail and make no money. Tough sell to kid who was watching his drop out father open up companies and make big money etc…

At that time there there surely was no “entrepreneur” type classes or clubs and the other huge failure in the schools at that time in my opinion was no “personal financial planning” direction…. credit cards, putting 10-20% away etc.. I picked up my fathers DR Wayne Dyer and Tony Robbins audio programs at 18 and couldn’t believe what I was hearing… the “Self Development”, “Self Education” drive in me opened up and with some sales training and on job experience I jumped into a 15 year sales Career that at times I enjoyed…. but ultimately I broke away from the Corporate World’s clutches and paradigm of me dialing for dollars & their need to have me work 40-50-60 hours and hand in a weekly-reports etc… Between the 4 Hour Work Week, my kids being born and the realization that money wasn’t the total prize and that in reality “TIME” is worth more…. I am free now, home office, super hockey dad and I decide when I work and spend time with our kids/family in homework, sports and involved in a way that my workaholic father never could be…. It is about “bettering” the generations and legacy, My father would have expected me to pick up on what he did so well and where he fell short and put together a better life experience for his grandkids… I’ll expect the same from mine as well.

Its dejavu now seeing my 7yr old ADD son be forced to sit down to follow the path I was on… but as see them off to the bus each day, I can’t help but want to make a difference… for him where I can, I know I already am by being “present”… I do agree with what someone above said by teaching kids at 9 and 10 to try small business ideas and getting them involved maybe in my business in some small way. Trying and failing is so good and necessary. Besides Sports and Music (which both my kids do)how does one introduce and teach creativity to the our kids, getting them thinking beyond the “systems”… and all without over-burdening them with insane amount of activities…

I agree with Mike to… handing trophies and medals out to all the teams for “Participation” …. Results and Accomplishments from digging in is what we should all still be teaching… if I hear another parent say “its just for fun” I am going to chuck… I’ll tell you whats Fun.. WINNING.. just ask Vince Lombardi.

The list goes on… sorry for the rant…I enjoy your blog here and the commenters as well

Reply

Elizabeth King March 28, 2012 at 4:35 pm

Besides Sports and Music (which both my kids do)how does one introduce and teach creativity to the our kids, getting them thinking beyond the “systems”… and all without over-burdening them with insane amount of activities…

Hi Jeff– thanks so much for your thoughtful comment. I would say that avoiding over-burdening them is exactly the right thing to do, and we both intuitively know why: because it inhibits their free time, their time to play. So, if we both know that to be true, I’d say turn off the television and turn the kids loose on the playground or in the back yard. Give them shovels and let them dig up a piece of the garden. If creativity is just the connection of ideas in new and interesting ways, removing the burden of activities and equipping them with the gift of time is probably the best place to start.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: